God is a man eater:
For this reason, men are sacrificed to him. Before, they were sacrificed to animals. Or perhaps, both before & now still continue today. The beast is a nation; a system that was never alive, nor dead. It's an Idol that only we can give life, by our life, & the more life the dead idol has, the more oppressed everyone is. For Idolatry at the root, is the belief that all can be judged according to one outward standard. That all must do this, or they're damned, unclean, an idolator, etc. The resurrection of the dead Idol imposes force upon the conscience of men.
Thus the more life we've given this beast, the more the prisons fill, & the more the conscience of man is imprisoned & oppressed. Idolatry is to say all who don't come to this gold, silver, brass, & Cedar wood Temple carved with beautiful images where we say God IS, moreso than anywhere else, yea all who don't come, are sinning. That is all Old Testament God of the Jews. The bad choice isn't serving man. The choice is, do we serve man, or do we serve animal? When we sacrificed to animal, we ate that animal, like we eat the levin our Beast prepares for us.
But we can choose to eat the bread of man instead of the bread of beast. We're not called to be vegetarian, no, no, we're called to be cannibals! If we sacrifice man, we eat man, & man is made to eat bread. Man no made to eat beast. Impossible for man to serve beast & man at same time. One cannot ride two canoes down a river. So we must eat the human flesh. We must worship holy man with all our might. Man is not to love by bread alone, but by every flesh of human.
Idolatry: like Daniel facing the Temple to publicly make a show of his prayer to God, is not idolatry in itself, for no man can judge such a thing by external site, yet it is idolatry if Daniel would teach that any Jew who doesn't pray towards the manmade image, is sinning. Thats when it is idolatry. Two men can pray before a statue, yet one could have committed idolatry & the other not. How so? One could be literally praying to the statue.
The other could be simply praying to God, but before the statue, as is his custom, & the statue brings his mind to a certain state of remembrance. Most Christians have had it & still have it backwards. Men must have different customs. Its not proof of sin of paganism or heathens barbarians, savages, etc. In fact, if there's no diversity of custom, it is proof that extreme idolatry exists within the air. Extreme. The reformation was good in many ways, but as it too took on a name & crystalized its own identity & doctrine, it only continued the evil before done.
It implores those different of custom to conform their misinformed customs. Its pure hypocrisy. Because everyone naturally sees customs different than their own to be blasphemous or paganistic. Yet if protestants would just think how ritualistic their customs are, they would see the hypocrisy. The only difference is their use to their customs found nowhere in scripture. And customs don't need foundation in scripture to not be evil. Only an idolator can think in such a way as that. Conformity breeds the tower of babel. Mindless consent builds the oppressive idol locking us up by the ever increasing millions. All we do should be of our own intent. It's the collective accumulation of the littlest things that feed the beast.
One must draw a line. I would to God we would have drawn it at the forced seatbelt law. At some point, we must establish law from the bottom up again. Its not some dream. This today, is some hellish dream. The lawmakers will write around what we consent to. If nobody wore their seatbelts, there'd be no seatbelt law. And that was no small precedent. I could give a damn about the statistics. How about genocide or millions in prison compared to the bit that insurance companies save by the forced seatbelt law? See, that took the freedom that grown adults always had to measure risk for THEMSelves, and put it in the authority of the state. Never before had that line been crossed.
Nobody has the right to measure risk for me. Drunk driving laws can be justified because they put other lives at risk, but everyone has the right to risk their lives however they please. I don't recognize laws that infringe this right. Because the state doesn't own me. When will they stop making choices for the individual to save them money? Where does that lead? Would the plandemic have happened had people bucked to the seatbelt blasphemy?
FINAL THOUGHTS
If the above described is not the sum of idolatry in all her decorative forms, then how does one explain the state of Russia right before she went into almost a hundred years of pure human sacrifice to the Bear Beast? In the gulag archipeligos where the term "concentration camp" was literally coined & for the gold coins of gold mines? Just read Dostoevsky. Russia was universally filled with idolatry before his passings, and all of his prophetic warnings came to pass more horridly accurate than even he could have imagined. Though the root of all idolatry is the same, none should expect that our idolatry should take the same decorative form as others.
For very few, not even Dostoevsky, had imagination big enough for the foundation Vlad Lenin laid, nor to ever imagine that a JOHN would have the audacity to praise the blood bath in celebratory hymn. John says it's easy to imagine if I try. Well I've tried time & time again, with no success. Perhaps if I was from the Manhattan projects, spoke Yiddish, had a Jewish wife & kids, all Jewish friends, & hung out at the synagogue while burning Christians as much as NON-JEW Vlad Lenin did, I'd be able to IMAGINE. Or better yet, if I was from Georgia, the Country, not the State, and my real last name meant, "Son of a Jew" in Georgian, and I spoke Yiddish, and was a son of Jew bitch, & changed my real name to Stalin, perhaps then I'd be able to imagine. Have you been to the glorious ol USSR Republics? I can only imagine possessing such artistic kill.
THE TEMPLE IDOL
And if that cursed Jew Temple isn't an Idol God always hated, why then is it paralleled to the tower of Babel? The people gathered, & then God scattered them? Said, "Let us scatter them"? Christ destroyed the Temple as he prophesied, exactly 40 years later. And it wasn't Gods 1st Temple destroying. The next Temple would be the 4th, not the 3rd.
Leave comment