Intellectual property? I’m not property. This gets to the question at hand I promise, but I beg you let me begin with a parable. Upon returning, the son of man eats first a burned piece of fish, then eats the honey comb. Why is it that when we eat the Word or God, we eat sweet honey? When Judgment happens, Christ is having Himself a feast, that much is sure. And He said that He shall not eat or drink again until with all of us.

The food is symbolic of the profit man renders God. And the luke warm water? He’ll spit that out. But the burned fish & honey comb, he’ll eat. All works together for good in the end like Joseph says. No matter how evil one wants to be, they’ll profit God in the end, whether they’ve selflessly served to the collective benefit that is the product of honey or are the burned fish; Whether they’ve selflessly given to the son of man or have buried their 1 talent. But who is the son of man?

What is “the Word”? What is the Bible except the posterity past down to benefit the son of man today, a blessing not possible without the collective sacrifice of our fathers before us who invested in the son of man, knowing they’d not be the ones to reap the harvest they selflessly sowed? For every son of man born reaps what he did not sow. But not every son of man selflessly sows what he knows he won’t reap, laying up treasures for the perfection of the son of man, future generations.

The 1 talent man was a hypocrite for blaming his sin on the fact that his Lord reaps what he doesn’t sow because every son of man when born, reaps what they never sowed. If the Christian West hadn’t had this selfless Spirit of sacrificing their lives in the present, for the benefit of their children they’d not partake of, today’s average person wouldn’t live better than any king in all history. Even people without children much more commonly had this selfless spirit than we do nowadays. And does not Christs’ sacrifice in His life serve to benefit us almost 2,000 years later? If we’re to follow Christ, surely we should work for the same things He did.

Yet we’ve hardly any faith in the son of man anymore, in the transformative power of God, though we’re the greatest beneficiaries of it. But instead we increasingly see the spirit of Noahs day, “lets live for today, for tomorrow we shall die.” Let’s be unthankful to those before us who sacrificed their lives for the hope they had in the son of man. We betray them & eat the future of our children, this same spirit being found in so much of Christianity today. “The the end of the world is here! Revelation! etc.” And we end up saying within our actions, “whats the point?” Surely this deception has Christians betraying no less the son of man than anyone else.

Should I speak on such a mystery? Maybe it’ll benefit not one man today, but perhaps it will the son of man. We literally kill our unborn children today, but is the 1 talent servant any less guilty of child sacrifice? As Christ says, What are we doing with the light while we have it, that we may one day be the children of the light? Are we not literally eating our unborn children? Their futures, their edification, their education, their wealth, we’re eating it all up.

Is not everyone a reflection of their father, just as Christ claimed He was? The hypocrites, He said their father is satan. We’re all reflections of our father, for we’re the fathers of all future generations. Who’ll bare the torch all the way to the cross roads that are the intersection between life & death? Who’ll give to the son of man? Who’ll multiply the light we have now, just as our fathers did before us, knowing they’d not benefit from what they sowed, but hoping in the son of man?

Why did the 1 talent man Bury his talent instead of INVESTING it in the son of man if this interpretation isn’t true? You bury what will be kept from future generations. Why are there copyright laws that lock up knowledge, the common property to the son of man? Or how about all the Government mandated classification of knowledge to where if any inventor wants to benefit all of mankind these days, the Fed classifies the patent as top secret for “national security safety” protecting our posterity like the Smithsonian did? The Fed lays claim jurisdiction quite literally on our own ideas & thus claims to own us. As Christ said, If they won’t enter themselves, why must they lock it up to those who would?

“But society wouldn’t have exploded from the free market without copyright laws because they protect profit incentive & free market competition”. That’s an oxymoron of a lie along with most all economic “theory”. First off, with no restriction, the market is more free! More than that, it invites more competition to the market of knowledge! Anyone who thinks copyright laws led to the boom should see how in a way it did, by being the legal grounds on which Tyndale was executed by the government. He did knowingly break copyright laws & was thus guilty under their law & legally martyred as Christ was. What of Julian Assange? He was about martyred too, LEGALLY. No man is the same after solitary confinement. He sacrificed much of his life in service of the son of man, & it was not in vain.

These hypocrites would have us believe the inverse of all things. The recogniztion that knowledge is the common property to the son of man, the posterity of all mankind, & the fact people died for it is the only reason there was a boom. To go back to the dark ages doesn’t preserve what we’ve inherited, it brings us back to the dark ages!! There’d be more progression with purification, not less, just as all is more clear with less smoke, not more, for there’d be less trash polluting the sacred space of knowledge if we disincentivize none-producing parasites by eliminating the anti-free market, oligarch monopoly laws that’ve made a joke of our anti-trust laws.

How is locking up the knowledge to eliminate competition as well as the spreading & progression of that knowledge progression? Is it not just a fat man who made the law to profit while contributing nothing? To enslave man & live off of his labor? What is power if not the control of information? What is a free market without the freedom to share information? Free speech? Knowledge, which is the property of no man? Don’t people see that it’s the greedy copyright laws that always brings the dark age back?

Songs are common property. At least they use to be until the 20th century began & all invention about ceased. Copyright law don’t incentivize anyone but parasites. For the beloved singer was loved for the song they sung, & they desired to sing because they loved to sing. Who cares if someone else sings the song & profits from it? Same with knowledge. Men were recognized for their contributions. But why should anyone owe them anything for doing something they didn’t have the knowledge or will to do with it? How does such entitled selfish communist thinking do anything but halt the progression of mankind?

See, when all copyright is eliminated, only those who actually produce make money, not parasites who feed on our blood. The shadow benefits nobody. When the market is truly free, it doesn’t degenerate us but feeds the spirit of man because all involved are real. The opposite to this is copyright, vampire control over freedom of information, ya know, where we were before martyrs died to free us of the copyright vampires & all the prosperity began after 1500.

We believe in stupid Jew theories designed to control us & poison our culture which has been happening since the laws first started at the beginning of the 20th century. Oh and just a disclaimer to eliminate 100% of the “practical” jew given arguments against what I say: I’m not saying that stealing someone else’s identity should be legal. We had laws against theft before the midevil copyright laws were resurrected with illegal walmart mcdonald franchising & every other loss of freedom.

Just because I’m saying dark age copyright laws are illegal & shouldn’t be obeyed by anyone, doesn’t mean I’m saying we should make it legal for someone to make money by pretending to be brittany spears. But yes, it should be legal for someone having recorded her song while hearing it, to sell that recording if they so choose. Who would disagree? Is she doing the labor that poor fellow is doing?

The artist makes money at their shows & from anything they sell themselves. They make a gross amount of money today, & even grosser, most of it doesn’t go to them, but to those who produce nothing. You think people would suffer if we eliminated all the parasites poisoning from the shadows, destroying these artists & our culture? You think there’d be less opportunity? Oh so sad if the beast ceased to be funded, & wicked contracts weren’t signed. What a victim! Aren’t they always?

Aww look at em crying at the wall in their humble $5,000 hats they bought with all the rings & necklaces they looted from the cold dead fingers of the Christians in Russia & Germany

The artists would make a living if there was a demand for them the same way artists always have except when in dark age countries that ban free speech and lay claim to intellectual “property” with jew contracts. It degrades the human being to even call such a thing anyone’s property & IS slavery. The slaves can’t tell the difference between the right & left hand. There’s no such thing as intellectual property, only tyranny that claims jurisdiction over your mind & soul as their property.

Had copyright laws not come back with Jew invented identity politics, we wouldn’t still be living in 1900 & we’d still have a culture that reflected us because we would be the contributors to our markets instead of the only ones excluded from them. There’s a clear reason for these things, known reasons we’ll never hear from popular media. And there’s a clear solution as well. We’ve been brainwashed to live defeated because these weasels are nothing when we unite. They’re nothing. Nothing can stand against the love of one who’s willing to lay down his life for a friend.

Stupid jew economic theory.

The business professors excitingly proclaim, “Did you know there’s such a thing as good debt!”. Someone so nuanced is too smart to waste his talents on ever owning a business. Don’t rob society the benefit of your licking feet to have a forced audience in the safety of your risk free occupation where mama takes care of you in exchange for your balls.